added documentation
This commit is contained in:
@@ -16,3 +16,26 @@
|
||||
- ~fetch requested files from mirror~
|
||||
- ~DB sync from mirror~
|
||||
- ~Config file and import~
|
||||
|
||||
Looking at what you've built and what's left on your TODO, here's how I'd think about the "done" line for a capstone:
|
||||
|
||||
**What you already have that's impressive:**
|
||||
- Real concurrent systems work — singleflight, atomic ops, mutex
|
||||
- Custom HTTP transport with timeout tuning
|
||||
- Atomic file writes with the tmp-then-rename pattern
|
||||
- Meaningful test suite with httptest, not just trivial unit tests
|
||||
- Clean dependency injection, thoughtful package boundaries
|
||||
- Config validation with proper error wrapping
|
||||
|
||||
**What would make it a complete capstone story:**
|
||||
- The streaming solution for large packages — this is your most interesting unsolved technical problem and directly demonstrates you understand the HTTP layer
|
||||
- At least one more meaningful feature working end-to-end, either the refresh scheduling via systemd timer or the prefetch-on-refresh logic
|
||||
- Actually deployed and serving your home network — "running in production" is a strong closer
|
||||
|
||||
**What I'd leave out of the capstone scope:**
|
||||
- The AUR builder — that's a whole second project honestly
|
||||
- Chi middleware — nice but not substantive enough to matter
|
||||
|
||||
The through-line you want to be able to tell is: *I built a caching reverse proxy from scratch in Go, handling concurrency, filesystem atomicity, and HTTP semantics correctly, and deployed it on real hardware.* You're close to being able to say that. The streaming piece and a working deployment are the remaining gaps.
|
||||
|
||||
How far out is the capstone deadline?
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user